An Orthodox Priest's View of Christian Unity

Fr. John Guy Winfrey, the parish priest of St. George Antiochian Orthodox Church in Grand Rapids, MI, and a former parishioner of the Anglo-Catholic St. Timothy's Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Ft. Worth, has written to offer the following piece on promising developments in Eastern Orthodoxy and his thoughts regarding their place in the larger drama of reconciliation between the "two lungs" of the Church, East and West.

Fr. Winfrey posits that the Holy Father's recent Apostolic Constitution providing for the corporate reconciliation of Anglican groups, Anglicanorum Coetibus, is a sign to Orthodox Christians that the Roman Pontiff is truly committed to the pursuit of a genuine unity in diversity.

* * *

I returned Saturday evening from the Parish Life Conference (for those of you who are not Antiochian Orthodox, it is our rough equivalent of a Diocesan Conference).  At the clergy meeting on Wednesday evening I heard something that I wasn't sure that I had actually heard.  I was startled, stunned, and paradoxically thrilled and filled with angst at the same time.  His Grace was speaking about the recent National Assembly of Bishops (Orthodox) and their work.  Much of this I had already heard, but had not spoken of it much because I continued to hear things that are better not made the subject of discussion in large groups.  After all, the questions that the bishops are discussing really stand solely within the purview of the bishops.

On Saturday, before I left Perrysburg (the suburb of Toledo, Ohio where the event was hosted), I asked one of my brother priests who seemed to be more "in the know" than I.  He has always been much more active in these areas than myself.  Following our conversation I was utterly floored.  So what was it that I had heard, first on Wednesday and then reiterated on Saturday?  I heard that it is thought within five years there will be only one jurisdiction of Orthodox in the United States.  There will no longer be a Greek Orthodox Archdiocese, and an Antiochian Archdiocese, and an Orthodox Church in America…  There will only be the Orthodox Church.  But this is not simply an American concern alone.  In truth it will be a world-wide action affecting Australia, Central America, South America, England, Europe and so on.

The details will prove to be some of the great hiccups I am sure.  Diocesan borders will be redrawn and restructured.  There will be a singular guideline for all the priests in the country rather than seeing it vary in every jurisdiction.  Admittedly there will be a period of transition that will naturally cause no little tension.  What of the calendar?  Will that be a source of unity, or will there be Old Calendar (Julian) and New Calendar parishes still?  Just the selection of a revised Julian Calendar has caused a terrible schism within the Orthodox Church since the 1920s.  Only time will be able to tell exactly what will happen, but five years is a very short time indeed.

One of my personal difficulties, and I have to be frank about this, is that it appears that everything will be under Constantinople.  There is some logic to this.  After all a recent study states that 80% of the Orthodox in the United States are already in the Greek Archdiocese.  If they have those numbers, then naturally they should have the lion's share of say.  Of course, it is being handled with a different sense.  The natural presvia (or order given clergy and local churches) is being followed.  Therefore the Greeks as representing the Ecumenical Patriarch — who anciently second only to Rome — is given the seat of honor, followed by Antioch (since Alexandria has no churches here), and on down the line.  I said that I had personal difficulties with this, and I do, but I'll save those thoughts for another post.

Having a singular jurisdiction would be a very healthy development in Orthodoxy here and elsewhere.  Yet I can't help to think that this is only part of something that is much larger.  We are tempted to look only at our own countries, or only at the Orthodox Church in isolation from what seems to be happening in the larger scene.  When I view the scene of Christianity on the largest possible scale, I get the distinct intuition that God the Holy Spirit is incredibly active right now.  Of course, God is always active, but there are moments that His activity seems more perceptible.

Consider these things a components or signs of something profound happening:

  1. The Orthodox Church is working on getting her house in order (trying to reconcile the scandal of multiple jurisdictions in many countries).
  2. Both Moscow and Constantinople have had very positive and warm meetings with Rome.
  3. Moscow has publicly given support to Pope Benedict XIV recently in Rome, and has called for greater work together with Rome on commonly held concerns.
  4. The recent agreed statement produced at Ravenna (and that which has been leaked from Cyprus) between the Orthodox and Catholics is incredible.
  5. Pope Benedict XVI issued the motu proprio, Summorum Pontificum, which gave very liberal and broad license to priests to celebrate the 1962 Latin Mass.  This is a very significant development because it helps to show the Orthodox that the Catholic Church is officially holding in a line of "continuity" rather than of "disruption".  Perhaps it doesn't need to be stated that this was one of the things that Archbishop Hilarion Alfeyev brought up as important when he met with the Pope.
  6. Pope Benedict XVI's stunning Apostolic Constitution, Anglicanorum Coetibus, which makes it possible in the very near future for Anglicans to enter into communion with the Catholic Church whilst keeping the great treasure of their patrimony shows the genuine sense that the Holy Father has of being the pivot of unity for the universal Church.  He seems quite content to allow diversity in unity and is completely unthreatened by it — provided there is theological unity (recall again the agreements of Ravenna and Cyprus here).
  7. The Western world is dying because of many spiritual and moral diseases, but perhaps more than anything else because of the loss of the organic and sacramental unity of the Church: Eastern and Western.  The desire to work together would seem to be a hint that maybe we understand this.
  8. The Roman Catholic Church is experiencing a nascent recovery of some of her tradition and liturgical beauty at the moment.  Although this is still small, one leading priest in this area continually reminds the faithful that this will be brought back together "brick by brick."  Deo volente!
  9. Finally there is the continual disintegration of non-historic Christianity into mere entertainment, leaving many of their faithful looking for something that is stabile, substantial, historic and real.

Fr. John Richard Neuhaus wrote a marvelous book in the 1980s called "The Catholic Moment."  It was, like so much of what he wrote, incredibly insightful.  However, I think that the moment that we might be seeing is not simply a moment for the Church of Rome, but for the entire Church Catholic (East and West).  I have a suspicion that Orthodox unity is being pressed forward, perhaps unconsciously, to make ready for a reunification of the Church.

There will be many who would not be able to make a journey to unity and union.  Some are liberal Roman Catholics (I'd prefer to say heterodox, or even heretical, rather than liberal) who are ably represented by the likes of the Tablet, or the National Catholic Review.  Some are the monastic extremists referred to by the Archbishop of Cyprus as the "Orthodox taliban."  Old Calendarists would not enter into reconciliation.  Perhaps the inclusion of the Orthodox would cause the Society of Saint Pius X to refrain from unity.

Nevertheless, I think that God might well be at work to bring us back together.  The reunion would bring more joy to my heart than I could possibly express.  I pray for this every day.  I hope for it every hour.  I dream of it every minute.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Tibernauts and the Vita Catholica

I started to answer a comment on my last post, and then realized that actually this was going to need a post of its own. The commenter, Jeremy Hummerstone, observed that whereas I was correct to suppose that the Book of Common Prayer would be unlikely to find much use by the clergy in an English ordinariate, this does not mean that its use would not be welcomed among many of the laity. I think that he is probably right. He also wondered whether one feature of an ordinariate would be ‘micromanagement of everything we are allowed to say and do’.

I understand that this is a genuine fear on the part of many; there has been a lot of debate in the Catholic Church about a tension between a centralized authority and local initiative. This may well have been fuelled by a resistance in the name of liberalism to Pope Benedict’s initiatives in various fields, which is perceived as threatening the important Vatican II principle of collegiality. In this hermeneutic, one must understand, ‘collegiality’ means the right of any liberal bishop or theologian to do as he sees fit without fear of reproach from above or below.

It is a sixties thing, really, this presentation of law as being the bastion of the powerful to oppress the weak. The whole purpose of law, as we know should be (and generally is) the reverse; it ensures that nobody gets the opportunity to establish his own will over a body of reluctant people. The fact that Rome is now calling some bishops to account is because it has restored the right of lower clergy and laity to appeal against their bishop where an injustice has been perceived to have been done. The people have a right to orthodox teaching and orthoprax liturgy; if this is denied them, then a higher authority has not just a right but a duty to intervene.

This does not mean a micromanagement of the Church: as long as the faithful are receiving the authentic tradition (the rites and teaching of the Church), then no intervention is necessary, nor does it take place; to suggest anything else, as some liberals in the Roman Catholic Church do, is simply scaremongering.

I have to say that I am very happy to have the safeguard of appeal to higher authority in operation. We believe that the Catholic faith is in essence the matured form of that faith that Christ taught to his apostles, do we not? Then I need to be sure that what I hear from my bishop and my pastor is in accord with this, and I want some means of redress, some right of appeal, if I believe that I am not getting what I am due.

I suppose that in the Western Anglican Church, there has not been any sort of meaningful check in favour of orthodoxy or orthopraxy except in the most serious cases, and then (as in the case of the ordination of practising homosexuals) intervention can arouse a storm of protest. I suppose that this is because there has been (since the Elizabethan settlement, really) such a divergence of views that a latitudinarian attitude is the only practical one possible if all are to live in peace. However, having accepted the Catholic system in Ordinariate form or in Roman form, Tibernauts will be expected to live by it; to teach it and to practise it as the rest of us do.

In this same spirit, Mr Hummerstone is correct that Church authorities will surely take a close interest in the rites that the ordinariates propose to become the Prayer of the Church, for they will need to express not just the beliefs of the gathered community of the Ordinariate Parish of St Miggin*, Little Wiggleswade, but of the entire Catholic Church. I, no doubt, will remain a priest of the Roman use of the Latin rite, but I need to be able to say 'Amen' to all the Church’s rites, including the Maronite, the Malabar, and those of the Ordinariate, and you need to be able to say 'Amen' to mine and all the others. Which is to say, in the selection of the rites that it will celebrate, without a doubt, the Ordinariate will play a very strong role, but the Universal Church will also want a say, and may have some strong views.

This is not by any means extraordinary or foreign to Anglican tradition, either. For hundreds of years, one of the things you could certainly say about Anglicanism was that, whatever any particular Anglican believed, he expressed his belief in the use of the same rites; namely, the Book of Common Prayer. The early Tractarians were very insistent on this (in public worship, anyway), and it was only towards the end of the nineteenth century that other practices began (the Anglican Missal, the English Missal) actually out of a desire to establish uniformity with the greater Catholic tradition. Now, within Anglicanism, the practice of almost congregationalist-style divergence in worship has been nearly canonized, but the practice is not Catholic, and, as I suggest, I think that really it is not Anglican either.

Public dissent from the official books of worship could in the past be justified by necessity, or by a desire to be united to the Catholic mainstream in as articulate a manner as a parish dared. However once joined formally to the Catholic mainstream, then surely all imperfect things will pass away, and Anglo-Catholics will be able to worship in a way that truly unites them to each other across parish boundaries, diocesan boundaries, national boundaries, seas and oceans and even time itself.

What is important to remember is that those first across the Tiber are going to be those who will decide these matters. That means that aspiring Tibernauts need to start thinking about this about a month ago and ask themselves just what they really want.

* Yes, there really is a St Miggin, or Miggo; an early African saint, feast day, 18th December.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Ecclesiastical Sundries

On the subject of reconciliation, which ‘the Synod attempted to examine profoundly … as a task facing the Church today’, the Pope noted that ‘if man is not reconciled with God, he is also in disharmony with the creation. … Another aspect of reconciliation is the capacity to recognise guilt and to ask forgiveness, of God and of neighbour’, he said.

‘We must learn the ability to do penance, to allow ourselves to be transformed, to go out to meet others and to allow God to grant us the courage and strength for such renewal. In this world of ours today we must rediscover the Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation’. In this context, the Holy Father described the fact that people are confessing less than they used to as ‘a symptom of a loss of veracity towards ourselves and towards God; a loss that endangers our humanity and diminishes our capacity for peace’.


Watch CBS News Videos Online

We reject the defamation of Pius XII and that accuses him of cowardice and even anti-Semitism and collaboration with the Nazi enemy. These accusations are absolutely without foundation. Likewise, we reject the interpretations that see any honoring of Pius XII as a minimizing of the importance of the Shoah or as a retreat from the breathtaking progress in the relations between Jews and Catholics in the past decades.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!