Our Lady’s Dowry

20 Malvern Hills Our Lady’s DowryI get quite emotional when someone talks to me about England. Just show me some pictures of medieval churches with their relics of pre-Reformation religion, the Malvern Hills, Sherwood Forest, my native Lake District or the City of York, and countless other favourite places – and play me something that had been composed by Vaughan Williams before the horrors of the Great War destroyed his faith and wounded his soul! I then inevitably have to wrench myself back to reality by realising that the pastoral English reverie is really the long dive towards Orwellian darkness with New Labour and the politically correct brigade.

It appears that the latest thing is an electronic detector in your household trash bin so that you pay as you throw away. England is possibly the most policed country in the world, other than perhaps North Korea and China. Am I like a Russian in 1917, condemned to take an increasingly greater distance from my native land, or might we really be at the beginning of that new spring?

A Cardinal for Canterbury? This is the title of an article here. Someone seems to be wildly hyping and having romantic notions. But that is not in the character of the streetwise and pragmatic Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, Archbishop Emeritus of Westminster. Does he really think that England is going to be as Catholic as, say, Poland in the nineteenth century or the countries of the Hapsburg Empire in the really old days?

We can lament that the Reformation ruined England, as the 1789 Revolution ruined France to the core. But, will the English people and political institutions really forgo secularism and return to Catholic Christendom? Perhaps this is not the idea for some in the Magic Circle.

We are still getting a good dose of 'London fog' when we hear of the Apostolic Constitution associated with the old ecumenism, as if everything was going beautifully in the Church of England (no one is reminding us of the inconvenient facts of women’s “ordinations” and same-sex “marriages”), and the Queen was about to bring the whole of England into communion with Rome. It isn’t happening like that! These myths were exploded as Anglicanorum Coetibus came into existence without interference from Cardinal Kasper. I really am surprised to read this stuff still coming from conservative Catholic sources.

It does not suffice to go on with secularised “religion” and kid people that it is moving into communion with Rome. The former Archbishop of Westminster said:

So, the English Church is a Church united and strong. It is out there in the areopagus, the market place of our diminished secular society which is looking for meaning and hope. This English Church would speak to the nation of true belief, of the dignity of the human person from the beginning of life to its natural end.

Uh? Sorry, I need a new pair of glasses and a hearing aid, or he does! The Cardinal dreams of

… this Church as one that would speak for life, the poor and all those without a voice. It would be one that defends the family and that "would continue to respect and dialogue with those who differ from us, people of other faiths, people with no faith, the agnostics and atheists. The English Church would be a strong voice, witnessing to all that is good and true. It would be a Church, sustained not only by Scripture, tradition and reason favoured by the Anglican Church but, crucially, by Scripture, tradition, reason and teaching authority. It would encapsulate that authority in teaching the truth and the beauty of the Christian faith."

These are strong words indeed, but from a source I wouldn’t trust further than I could throw him! We have already read reams about an English Catholic Church that was doing everything to stick its heels in, promote the liberal Tablet line and keep ignoring “inconvenient” directives from Rome when it came to cleaning up the town.

Nice  try, Your Eminence, but you will have to do better to convince this sceptical Englishman.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

A Daring Decision Fulfils a Newman Prayer

The article below appears in the current edition of Faith Magazine.  In 1997, Dr. William Oddie, a biographer of G. K. Chesterton and former editor of The Catholic Herald, wrote the then controversial book, The Roman Option: The Realignment of English Christianity, in which he described a possible future development whereby Anglicans abandoned by the Established Church might enter the Catholic Church en masse.  Here is an extract from the back cover of the book:

The Church of England's historic decision to ordain women to the priesthood has forced a dramatic realignment of Christianity in the English speaking world. In the space of five years, it has brough irreversible change into the heart of Anglicanism, and transformed its relationship with the Roman Catholic Church.

In this radical book, William Oddie gives an insider's account of the origins and possible future development of the 'Roman Option', in which disaffected Anglicans seek to move en masse to the Catholic Church, and argues that the Catholic bishops must be ready to respond boldly to the real crisis for Anglicanism which lies ahead…

Of course the Catholic bishops were not ready (and many are still not ready) to respond boldly to this crisis in Anglicanism, and it ultimately took the revolutionary thinking of Pope Benedict XVI to see such a "Roman Option" realized.

In this current article, Dr. Oddie reflects on how the Holy Father and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith boldly sidestepped the "unapostolic" English bishops to finally guarantee to Anglo-Catholics a place of refuge in an often unwelcoming Catholic Church.

My emphases and comments in blue.

* * *

William Oddie FAITH Magazine January-February 2010

A Daring Decision Fulfils a Newman Prayer

I very much hope that Catholics in this country and elsewhere will warmly welcome into our communion the members of the new ordinariates. Nevertheless, in terms of the relations between Rome and the bishops' conferences affected, the way in which these ordinariates have been invented is disgraceful.

The present Apostolic Constitution is indeed a godsend, but had the Catholic bishops been more receptive of dispossessed Anglo-Catholics, corporate reunion could have been achieved years ago — and reconciled far more Anglicans to the Church than may now be immediately possible.  Instead, ideology was allowed to triumph over apostolic mission and the Lord's prayer for the unity of His Church was ignored.  This is a disgrace!

Thus, Nicholas Lash – in, of course, The Tablet - on the Apostolic constitution which has authorised and enabled the setting up of jurisdictions under which Anglicans may become Roman Catholics not individually but collectively. The Tabletatura, of course, hate the whole thing; and they object particularly to the reception of communities rather than individuals, quite simply because far more will come, numerically, under this dispensation than under what previously obtained: i.e., special fast-track arrangements for clergy wanting reordination (this has helped substantially with the shortage of priests) but the old business of "individual submission" for the laity, and off with them to some denatured liturgy at the ghastly concrete Catholic barracks down the road. Quite simply, the Spirit-of-Vatican-ll boys don't want the converts at all, because they know that they are coming not for the English bishops, and certainly not for The Tablet, which they loathe and despise, but for the Pope. [Precisely.]The Tablet would like smaller numbers to come, one by one, in a way which provides the opportunity to acclimatise them into the kind of reductionist belief-system they favour. Thus The Tablet's weaselly suggestion that

They do have an alternative …. they could, as countless converts to Roman Catholicism have done before them including many former Anglo-Catholics, apply to enter into full communion through the normal processes. Nowadays that usually means enrolling in the parish-based scheme called the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, or RCIA, which includes a rite for baptised Christians who want to become Catholic.

After a journey of faith involving instruction from a parish catechist, candidates follow a series of public steps leading to a ceremony of admission, with others who have made the same journey. … A simple formula of doctrinal assent is required … far less elaborate than adherence to every one of the Catholic catechism's 2,865 paragraphs which the apostolic constitution envisages.

Why implicitly accept the entirety of Catholic teaching by joining a personal ordinariate (which defines the Catechism of the Catholic Church as a doctrinal standard) when you can recite a simple formula with mental reservations like the rest of your RCIA class?

Well, there you have it: what The Tablet wants for any convert is the half-cock reprocessed seventies Catholicism you get in RCIA (I speak from personal experience) rather than the full-blooded total Catholicism of The Catechism of the Catholic Church (which many of them already know far better than most cradle Catholics).

We've recently had a bit of controversy about the appropriateness of RCIA for the reception of Anglicans — indeed any Christians — into full communion.  Even when applied appropriately, RCIA is very often deficient — and there appears to be a good deal of defensiveness of the part of some commenters when this fact is observed.  Are there good RCIA programs out there?  Of course there are.  Have Anglicans (or others) being received into the full communion of the Catholic Church had positive experiences in RCIA?  No doubt they have.  But I would caution our Roman Catholic readers not to form their impression of the state of Church from web sites like the New Liturgical Movement or What Does the Prayer Really Say? These sites often focus on a few — and there still only a few — "showcase" churches.  Most parish churches in North America and the UK are a liturgical and catechetical wasteland.  If you are in a conservative parish with an orthodox priest where the Faith is taught in its integrity and experienced "in the beauty of holiness," then you are most assuredly in the minority.  Of course the times are changing, and there is a reform of the Reform afoot, but as Fr. Z says, "brick by brick."  There is a very long way to go.  There is a reason that The Tablet is keen on subjecting Anglo-Catholics to RCIA: they are fairly certain that it will destroy their faith.

But you can understand The Tablet's hostility and confusion. The fact is that the whole thing has been an enormous shock: not only to those who hate it all but to those who are still glowing with delight, for whom the words "personal ordinariate" induce not the slightest irritation at the usual graceless Vaticanese but on the contrary, sheer joy at the generous fulfilment the Pope has granted of their deepest hopes : these include many former Anglicans like myself and many more now preparing for the journey they have always longed to make, together with their whole ecclesial community. Of that, more in a while: but first, we need to get back to that extraordinary announcement: extraordinary both in its content and in its timing, as well as in its modus operandi. Why so very unexpected?

Continue reading

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

All Chiefs and No Indians

Isn’t it incredible how many people know it all about the Apostolic Constitution and the TAC and so forth! I have said in a comment to my last posting that I have had enough on the subject of the liturgy, because no progress has been made and those who know something about what the liturgical usage in the future Ordinariates will be aren’t saying anything. Perhaps my paltry contributions may have some slight influence on someone in the circuit – “I didn’t think of that before. That’s what we should do”.

Then someone else shows a picture of a comic motorcycle on his website and might as well have called it “Archbishop Hepworth’s Car”. I don’t even take that one seriously, because it's the same old stuff being spewed out. It’s almost like Lenin or Gramschi droning on about the Proletariat being exploited by the Capitalists and the Enemies of the People! Perhaps he could do an article on my sailing dinghy or my old Renault van! I still have my old bicycle too. In the end of the day, who cares?

More seriously, Damian Thompson has an article about Mgr Andrew Faley having another go. You know, the meddlesome English priest who said the Magic Circle would smack down the Pope, or whatever his words truly were. He's the one who got smacked down. Now the dog has licked his wounds, as the Terminator would say, he's back!

It’s all that stuff about our being disgruntled, disaffected and impossible-to-please Anglicans who can’t stand the thought of our comfortable lives being disturbed by womynprysts. We are not talking about escape hatches. Whenever I have spoken with Archbishop Hepworth, I have found him to be modern and daringly innovative rather than being a conservative traditionalist – something I love in my spiritual father and canonical superior. I can say the same of Bishop Broadhurst, the kind of man I would have loved to have as my parish priest!

We do well to follow Mr Thompson’s advice –

Fortunately, however, the final word rests with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Benedict XVI. My advice to Anglicans wanting to convert en masse: keep open independent lines of communication with the CDF.

That’s what our Hierarchy is doing.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!