A Poll of Our British Audience

It has been suggested that since the majority of Anglo-Catholics in Britain, having used the English Missal while the Tridentine Rite prevailed, and having followed Rome's lead in adopting the Missal of Pope Paul VI in its rather banal and unfaithful English translation, Anglo-Catholics in England, Scotland, and Wales have become accustomed to modern liturgical language and quite a bit detached from the Prayer-Book tradition (insofar as the Eucharistic rite is concerned, at least).  So this poll is for inhabitants of Great Britain only.

If you are a resident of England, Scotland, or Wales, which style of liturgical language would you prefer to prevail in the Ordinariates?

View Results

loading A Poll of Our British Audience Loading ...
* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

St. Agatha's Beautiful Web Site

For those of us who trace our Ordinariate-roots to the Traditional Anglican Communion (TAC), St. Agatha's Church in Portsmouth holds a special place in our hearts.

This is where the members of TAC College of Bishops, dressed in their robes and mitres, solemnly signed on the altar the 2007 Portsmouth Petition, which said, in part:

* * *

Recognising that obligation, and with great confidence in the Lord and in the power of the Holy Spirit, a worldwide community of Anglican Christians has united under the name “The Traditional Anglican Communion” for three main purposes:

  • To identify, reaffirm and consolidate in its community the elements of belief, sacraments, structure and conduct that mark the Church of Christ, which is one throughout the world:
  • To seek as a body full and visible communion, particularly eucharistic communion, in Christ, with the Roman Catholic Church, in which it recognises the fullest subsistence of Christ’s one Church; and
  • To achieve such communion while maintaining those revered traditions of spirituality, liturgy, discipline and theology that constitute the cherished and centuries-old heritage of Anglican communities throughout the world.

The Bishops and Vicars-General of this Communion, now meeting in Plenary Session in the Church of Saint Agatha, Portsmouth, England, on the Feast of Theresa of the Child Jesus and in the days following, have reached the following mind which they have asked their Primate and delegates to report to the Holy See:

  1. We accept the ministry of the Bishop of Rome, the successor of Peter, which is a ministry of teaching and discerning the faith and a “perpetual and visible principle and foundation of unity” and understand this ministry is essential to the Church founded by Jesus Christ.  We accept that this ministry, in the words of the late John Paul II inUt Unum Sint, is to “ensure the unity of all the Churches”.

* * *

I still find this letter inspiring.  I loved it that this is what the TAC stood for.  Sadly, the new TAC has abandoned this approach.

The bishops also signed the Catechism of the Catholic Church and its Compendium.

Did they know what they were signing?  Did they know what accepting the ministry of Peter meant?

One who did is former Bishop Robert Mercer who was ordained a Catholic priest earlier this year.  It warms my heart to see the impressive new web site of St. Agatha's up, with a picture of him that was taken here in Ottawa with our altar behind him.

And what a great work St. Agatha's Trust is doing to preserve the treasures of history.

Check out their campaign to get a full set of bells!

An appeal has been launched to provide a ring of 8 bells for St. Agatha’s Church in the heart of Portsmouth. This will establish the St. Agatha’s Ringing Centre, to promote the art of Church bellringing among the young people of the area. The bells will be rung regularly by the many ringers in the locality and from all over the country. How appropriate that St. Agatha is the patron saint of bellringing!

 

St. Agatha’s is sometimes called "The Cathedral of the Car Parks”. Standing virtually alone in what was an artisan area of Portsmouth, the church was the inspiration of the legendary Fr. Robert Dolling, champion of the poor, who was greatly loved and respected by all. Abandoned in 1954, it became a Naval Store for many years, and was restored for public use in 1994. St. Agatha’s now serves the community, not only as a church, but also as a concert hall and exhibition centre. The building is cared for by St. Agatha’s Trust, a registered charity that will also manage the appeal.

 

St. Agatha’s Trust has saved many fine artefacts no longer required by redundant churches and, with the help of the Keltek Trust, a registered charity that finds new homes for redundant bells, has now acquired 4 bells which will provide the 4 deepest notes of the octave. The money raised by the appeal will provide 4 new bells to complete the octave, hanging all 8 bells in a new bell frame and the fitting out of the Ringing Centre.

It touches me deeply that this place is such a place of hope and renewal, not only for the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham, but for the treasures of our Anglican patrimony.

Beautiful web site.  And!  They have a Facebook page.  How about going on over and "Liking" it.  There are only two likes so far.  I think I was #2.  Let's see how much traffic we can send!

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Holy Father Donates $250,000 to the Personal Ordinariate of OLW

Great news for the Ordinariate in England and Wales!  Thank you, Holy Father, for your unflagging support for the reconciliation of Anglican Christians with the Holy See!

* * *

PERSONAL ORDINARIATE OF OUR LADY OF WALSINGHAM
1 MAY 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

POPE DONATES $250,000 TO ORDINARIATE

papal keys Holy Father Donates $250,000 to the Personal Ordinariate of OLWPope Benedict XVI has donated $250,000 to support the work of the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham. The gift will help establish the Ordinariate as a vibrant part of the Catholic Church in England and Wales.

The news from Rome came to Monsignor Keith Newton, the Ordinary of the Personal Ordinariate, and read “The Holy Father has benevolently permitted a donation of $250,000”.

Responding to the gift, Mgr Newton said, “I am very grateful to the Holy Father for his generosity and support. This gift is a great help and encouragement as we continue to grow and develop our distinctive ecclesial life, whilst seeking to contribute to the wider work of evangelisation in England and Wales”.

The Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham was established in January 2011 to enable Anglicans to enter into the full communion of the Catholic Church whilst retaining essential elements of their heritage and tradition. It comprises around 1200 lay faithful and 60 clergy spread across the United Kingdom.

The Apostolic Nuncio, His Excellency Archbishop Antonio Mennini, was instrumental in securing the Holy Father’s assistance. On the announcement of the gift the Archbishop said, “The Holy Father’s gift of $250,000 is a clear sign of his personal commitment to the work of Christian Unity and the special place the Ordinariate holds in his heart. I pray for the continuing success and development of the Ordinariate”.

Speaking of the need for further fundraising the Nuncio said, “I urge all those who share our Holy Father’s vision to lend their spiritual and material support to the Ordinariate, especially in these early days”.

Mgr Newton, in response to the remarks of Archbishop Mennini said, “The support and encouragement given to us by the Apostolic Nuncio has been very significant. We were very pleased to welcome him as the Principal Celebrant of our Chrism Mass: a clear sign of our deep desire to remain closely united the Holy Father”.

The Ordinariate welcomed over 250 new members this Easter. Bishop Alan Hopes will ordain deacons for the Ordinariate in Westminster Cathedral on 26 May 2012 at 10.00 a.m., and two men in their twenties were ordained to the Sacred Priesthood in London earlier this month.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Gearing-up for More Ordinations in England

Tomorrow, Saturday 4 June 2011, the Archbishop of Southwark will — at the request of the Ordinary — ordain seven men to the priesthood in the Catholic Church, for service in the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham. The Solemn Mass of ordination will take place in Southwark Cathedral at 3.00pm and will mark the start of this summer's ordinations to the priesthood for the Ordinariate.

 

On Monday 6 June, the Bishop of Clifton and the Archbishop of Birmingham will ordain deacons, and the Archbishop of Westminster will ordain more priests in Westminster Cathedral on Friday 10 June at 5.30pm. All are very welcome to each of these. Please pray for those preparing for ordination.

A full schedule for the ordinations is published on the website www.ordinariate.org.uk in the Calendar section. The list of prospective candidates is listed in the News section of the website.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Glimpses of Divine Humor

Thank you to dedicated reader David Quatchak who recommended and secured permission to reprint this story of discovery and conversion.

* * *

Glimpses of Divine Humor

By Andrew M. Seddon, M.D.

On the rare occasions when I attempt the impossible task of imagining what heaven might be like, I envision saints—but not the dour, stern, serious saints of so much artwork. I imagine smiling saints with a humorous twinkle in their eyes. Saints such as Aidan, Cuthbert, Columba, and Patrick; an eighth-century pilgrim to the Holy Land from Byzantium (more of him later); and closer in time and experience, Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman.

Why smiling saints? Because, looking back along my path to the Catholic Church, I can see the instances of humor that God used along the way, glinting like flecks of gold sprinkled in a vein of quartz.

Unlike the Celtic saints and the pilgrim who were Catholics in the undivided Church, I, like Cardinal Newman, was an unexpected convert from Anglicanism. Saints, circumstances, history, and my heritage—no doubt at God’s instigation—united to bring me not only across the Atlantic but the greater distance across the Tiber.

Early Years

I was born in England, the son of a Baptist minister. My parents emigrated to the U.S. when I was young, and my father pastored churches in upstate New York, New Brunswick, Maryland, and West Virginia. My sister and I grew up on his excellent, Bible-based preaching, and I will forever be grateful to my parents for the loving Christian home they provided.

My parents recall that my first profession of faith came at age 7, and baptism at 10, but I cannot remember a time when I was not a believer. Being a Christian has always been a natural part of me.

We moved often, and though the flavor of the churches varied, all were Baptist. We had little contact with other denominations. The Catholic Church was rarely mentioned.

If I ever thought of Catholics, it was as fellow Christians who had somehow gotten a little off-track, perhaps never having fully escaped the Middle Ages. Catholics weren’t bad or evil, just poor souls who had to work unduly hard to earn their salvation and who were overly attached to Mary. (She was never referred to in our home as the “Blessed Virgin.”)

It was curious, then—and perhaps the first incident of divine humor—when, after I completed my freshman year at the University of New Brunswick, my parents moved to Maryland, and I transferred to Mount St. Mary’s College (now University) in Emmittsburg—a Catholic college! I didn’t choose “The Mount” for religious reasons, however, but because of its academic reputation and its modest size.

Although I was a pre-med student, my course of study included several required theology classes. My term papers, unsurprisingly, evidenced my Protestant viewpoint. One was returned covered in comments: “See me,” “Ask me about this,” “Talk to me.”

Continue reading

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

It's Actually Happening!

The blogging world is reporting the reception into full Catholic communion of five (or six) Anglican bishops and their wives, along with three nuns from Walsingham, to take place at Westminster Cathedral on the Solemnity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God (January 1).

It's reported here, here, and here.

The English Ordinariate is beginning… can the others be far behind?

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

"If the Church of England Were to Fail, It Should Be Found in My Parish."

I came across this passage from Owen Chadwick, the distinguished historian of the nineteenth century Church, who had a prose style which is surely the equal of R. W. Church and even perhaps Blessed John Henry Newman himself. It is in a essay "The limitations of Keble" reprinted in The Spirit of the Oxford Movement (CUP 1990):

"… A child may have ideals the easier because he or she knows not the human compromises necessary to embody those ideals in act. Keble's nobility was partly of this kind. The most characteristic of all his sayings is the dictum at the time of the Gorham case,

If the Church of England were to fail, it should be found in my parish.

The stance is so squared and so real that it takes a moment to see how cloud-capped are the towers so defended…"

Yet it is precisely this view which seems to be the fall-back position of many today standing in the ruins amidst the settling dust of the collapse of the Anglo-Catholic Movement. This is not to criticise John Keble unduly; it was precisely his lack of what many at the time would have called realism, and his refusal to admit defeat, which led to the continued existence of Anglo-Catholicism itself after the crises of the 1840s and 50s.

But no one needs to have the limitations of his view spelled out to them. It was a paradoxical comment in 1850, if highly poetical and almost convincing; today it lacks even that partially saving grace. Now it can only mean a kind of 'catholic' congregationalism (see the comments of Bishop Peter Elliott here)  for one generation before the waters close over our heads.

There are some whose theology (anglo-catholic but anti-papal) leaves them little choice but to dig in, pull up the drawbridge of their parishes and try to survive as best they can, for as long as they can; but this is a desperate last ditch survival tactic not an ecclesiology (the opposite of any Catholic theology of communion), and for many of us it would seem to lack the essential element of hope which alone would justify struggling on in increasing isolation in the gathering darkness. It is undoubtedly a witness, and one worthy of a certain amount of respect, and even greater sympathy, but nevertheless a somewhat nihilistic vision to have to teach to one's flock for a limited period until one's inevitable retirement, and totally devoid of any evangelistic purpose.

But the temptation now (and it's one we should firmly resist) is for those who are able to see their path more clearly to pass judgement on those who, as yet, can't see a future at all. What one man will see as the fulfilment and consummation of a life's work and of a centuries-old tradition may be seen by another as denial and betrayal. That's simply how it is.

To me at least, one of the most fascinating aspects of Anglicanorum Coetibus is the way it has shone a searchlight on the Catholic Movement in Anglicanism and revealed just how theologically diverse a group we are, even among the 'orthodox' and (dare I say it) those societies and organisations committed to reunion with Peter, but which have also attracted members due to their prominence in the fight against women's ordination. What were once smaller and fairly cohesive groups have become wide coalitions of interest. Adversity sometimes makes strange bedfellows; that has never been more evident than at the present time. That being the case, it is not at all surprising that we have been simply incapable of a truly corporate response to a prophetic gesture such as the one which has been held out to us by Pope Benedict.

But it is the impossibility of corporate reunion which has left not a few feeling vulnerable, isolated and exposed, wondering who will decide their future and on what basis, and pondering, either aloud or to themselves, whether their useful lives are now over.

What gives me hope? Firstly, that (to quote a highly distinguished English blogger) an 'elderly Bavarian gentleman' who happens both to be the most eminent living theologian, and (providentially for us) Supreme Pontiff,  has seen something in our tradition which is worthy of preservation and renewal in the service of the Universal Church.  And secondly, that he has a habit of getting his way.

We don't have many details as yet about the Ordinariates, but we are able to pray. However great has been  our disillusionment with authority in our present situations, often with very good reason, we shouldn't let that colour our view of the future as it unfolds. Christ will not abandon us.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Do the Ordinariates & SSWSH Need One Another?

Despite the rhetoric being bandied about in this rather unreal period before the Ordinariates are set up, and as the situation in the Church of England itself becomes ever more confused, when persuasion and recruitment are never far from the top of the agenda and everyone is concerned to justify their own personal reactions to the Anglo-Catholic endgame, could it be that SSWSH and the Ordinariates, far from being warring rivals for the remnant of those in the tradition of the Oxford Movement, may turn out to be complementary and even part of the same journey of faith?

Much of course will depend upon the attitude of SSWSH's episcopal leadership. Will they attempt to rubbish or even downplay the structures which will be set up as a result of Anglicanorum Coetibus, or will they (as I hope) keep their powder dry and their options open? They must have been given food for thought by the recently restated opinion of the Archbishop of Canterbury, presumably speaking as the leading spokesman of the Anglican Communion as a whole, that women's ordination is a 'second order' issue. From the addresses and interviews he has given in recent months, the worrying truth seems to be that even Dr Williams himself has no visceral understanding (sympathy is another matter, few question that) of those for whom the whole concept of "second order" issues makes very little sense, particularly when applied to matters which have a bearing on the nature of communion and the validity of the sacraments. Purely on an empirical level, if women's ordination really is a second order issue for the Anglican establishment (although their attempts to relegate it to the status of 'adiaphora' have run into an ecumenical brick wall) why then has it become such a test of loyalty and even qualification for office in our church? Given that, the question needs to be asked how much real generosity could ever have been expected and how much leeway will the embryonic Society of Saint Wilfrid and Saint Hilda be given now by the C of E establishment, when the very premise for the Society's existence is so profoundly misunderstood even by those of our opponents we thought did, to an extent, understand us? Because without that leeway, the SSWSH bishops will have to resort to illegality and defiance (how much appetite there will be at this late stage for that is anyone's guess — not much, is mine) and ultimately will be forced out of the Church of England altogether.

Again, Reform and the Catholic Group should be extremely wary of placing too much confidence in knife-edged votes in General Synod. As in England in 1991, we experienced the same degree of over-confidence in Wales in 1996, and the most surprising people either changed their minds, abstained or absented themselves for all kinds of reasons, genuine, confused or self-serving.

On the other hand, SSWSH could very well, if it is regarded by its leaders and members as a kind of halfway house for those who realize they will in time have to leave the familiar shores of the C of E to swim either the Tiber or the Bosphorus, help to keep alive precisely those liturgical, theological and pastoral traditions which the Ordinariates hope to repatriate within the Catholic Church, and which are rapidly being ditched by the western Anglican mainstream.

For the Ordinariates themselves, hoping to grow steadily, the presence of a well-disposed Anglo-Catholicism, even on a C of E life support system, could in all kinds of ways be more advantageous than one which has been suddenly put to death. Even if I am being consciously over-optimistic and resolutely non-confrontational in saying all this, such an situation can only have the shelf-life only of one generation of clergy. Votes in synods will see to that, given that Anglicanism has now been revealed in the words of one blog as "a fallible denomination whose essentials are up for votes." Some might think that in itself is reason enough for considering leaving.

Surely the task in which we all believe is the defense and the setting free of the Catholic tradition within Anglicanism, the attempt if not to save Anglicanism from itself (it's now too late for that) then at least the setting up of an authentic, orthodox and evangelistically effective alternative to the present doctrinal and ethical chaos. (Many of us would wish to add that in order to achieve this, union with the Successor of Peter is essential, not optional.) So, then, we should be single-mindedly serious in pursuing that strategy and not allow ourselves to be distracted and divided from one another by the short term political tactics necessary for even temporary survival in the quasi-parliamentary governing structures of contemporary Anglicanism. Whichever side of the Tiber we find ourselves in a year or so, we will still have more in common than that which separates us, the battles are essentially the same, and our divisions more about time scale than anything more theologically substantial.

As for the prospect of a joint C of E / CBEW committee in order to better facilitate the setting up of the Ordinariates, the critics are right. It's an excellent idea if it could be concerned with the transfer of property and resources and with resolving any disputes arising from that. Failing that, some offers of "help," however well-intentioned, are best declined.

Some animals lose their essential nature if they are domesticated.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

The English Connection

The Traditional Anglican Communion’s groundbreaking decision to approach the Holy See has been well-documented and much discussed over the last three years, most recently by our own Fr. Fleming in his new book, Convinced by the Truth: Embracing the Fullness of the Catholic Faith.  Now that the Holy Father has come and gone in the UK and the Sacred Synods there are confirming that some clergy and laity there are ordinariate-bound, mostly from the Province of Canterbury, it seems as if it might be a good time to piece together a bit of the history of how those in the UK also played a key role in the development of Anglicanorum Coetibus.  Most of this has appeared in other scattered sources, but I thought it would be good to at least make a first pass at a more coherent narrative.

When the news of the Apostolic Constitution broke last October, many of us speculated that an important role had been played by elements within the Church of England because of the choice of a press conference in London with the Archbishop of Canterbury and the fact that more than one C of E bishop had a statement ready for synchronized release.  These initial hunches received more support in comments made at FIFUK’s 2009 National Assembly shortly after the announcement of Anglicanorum Coetibus.  Statements made last fall along with information that has trickled into the public record since then have shed light on how the Church of England’s Flying Bishops lived up to their name in moving about to do their part in building the bridge across the Tiber.

It is my understanding that the English approach began almost by chance with a spring holiday.  Bishop Andrew Burnham of the See of Ebbsfleet traveled to Rome in April of 2008 to celebrate his 60th birthday.  While there, he sought meetings with the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  Rather than finding himself having an informal chat with the monsignori of the staff, he found himself invited to meet with Cardinals Kasper and Levada.

Pleasantly surprised at the warmth of this reception, Bishop Andrew was able at short notice to arrange for Bishop Keith Newton of Richborough Episcopal Area to hop a plane and join him for the meeting.  In that meeting, these two suffragans of the Archbishop of Canterbury asked whether anything might be done to help English Anglo-Catholics.  They received a warm response and thereafter became aware of some of the details of the TAC approach and that other groups of Anglicans had been knocking at the door as well.

More than 15 years earlier, the then Cardinal Ratzinger had said of Forward in Faith, “If they accept the Magisterium, we have no alternative but to finding a means of admitting them to full communion with the Holy See.”  It was becoming clear that the Vatican would be as good as the now Holy Father’s word.  Subsequent events bore this out.

At this point, we can only speculate about what happened between the General Synod of the Church of England’s vote in July 2008 to move forward with the admission of women to the Episcopate and the present.  Media reports have included sightings of the Bishops of Fulham and Richborough in Vienna, where they met Cardinal Schonborn in January 2009, and of the Bishops of Ebbsfleet, Fulham, and Richborough in Rome in April 2010, where they had meetings in the Vatican. No doubt meetings and regular contacts have continued up to the present in both in England and in Rome.  Now we stand at the threshold of the public phase of the process, which I suppose one might think of as something of an ecclesiastical IPO.  In the words of Fr. Kirk at last year’s FIF Assembly, “Well, you’ve asked for it, now you’ve got it.”

I thought it was useful to fill in a bit of this particular history at the present time to show that the Holy See has dealt faithfully and pastorally with those who have approached it.  Now that the moment approaches when decisions are required or at least possible, the wedding-night jitters are rising among some of those considering taking advantage of the Apostolic Constitution.  Many ask whether the Holy See will treat them fairly.  I tell this story to help assure those of us who have not been in the inner circle of these developments that the process leading up to the publication of Anglicanorum Coetibus and now leading into its implementation, gives us evidence of the care and solicitude of the Holy Father and many in the curia and the various national hierarchies.  The Bishops of Ebbsfleet and Richborough and those who joined them later took a risk, as did the leadership of the TAC, and now that faith is being rewarded.  For many years, Bishop Andrew has been known for saying, “RITA!” for “Rome is the answer.”  Now Rome has given its answer, and the care given in consulting various groups in crafting that answer gives ample evidence of Rome’s solicitude.

However the ball began to roll among the various groups who approached the Holy See, Anglicanorum Coetibus was addressed to GROUPS of Anglicans who formally petitioned or had merely hoped for the full reunion that has been one of Anglo-Catholicism’s most fervently held desires for more than 175 years.  Whether it was TAC greasing the wheels or the English giving things a push, or the additional impetus added by groups and individuals as yet unknown, the train got moving and provision was made for everyone.  As the Bishop of Fulham said last fall, “This is a world approach of which we shall be a part.”

Now we enter a new phase where “coetibus” must become “coetus,” as old identities and acronyms fall away and groups coalesce into ordinariates in communion with the Catholic Church.  The ordinariates will be a home for members of the TAC, traditionalists from within the Church of England, members of other bodies inside and outside of the Anglican Communion, and for many who have already entered the Catholic Church individually and now welcome the opportunity to return to their native patrimony.

Those further back on the caravan road to full communion will be looking ahead to the vanguard, not only to see how it is treated by Rome, but also how those who go first treat one another.  As all of the various groups of Anglicans who will make up the ordinariates coalesce, we will do well to remember the Saviour’s prayer for unity in the Gospel of John:

Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;  That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.  And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:  I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!

Complacence vs. Patience

I didn't attend last week's Sacred Synod in London; as one already publicly in the departure lounge it seemed inappropriate to attend a meeting intended for those plotting out possible but as yet undecided futures.

As it happens, perhaps I should have gone; not because I might have added to the discussion but because I would not then have been on the Kenton Road at 3.30pm and on the receiving end of a collision in which my car was totalled and I and one of my kids ended up with whiplash and other minor but real injuries. What a choice: the CofE's train wreck or my own car wreck!

Not having attended, I can observe at one pace back what others are saying about it and the newly formed Missionary Society of St Wilfrid & St Hilda.

Some are rejoicing in a new hope for Catholic Anglicanism within the CofE. Some are despairing its pointlessness — why on earth propose such a venture when Anglicanorum coetibus should already have answered the questions posed by those who call themselves Anglican and Catholic in whichever combination but are unable or unwilling to make an individual submission?

So, fool's errand or new chapter?

One could have asked — and perhaps people did, but there were no blogs then to go back and check on — the self-same question about Forward in Faith. Other than it has a rather snappier name that lends itself better to acronym than the new body, and a more overtly political purpose, it sought as the MSOSWASH does, to provide an ongoing home for Anglo-Catholics in an uncomprehending, even hostile CofE.

Almost two years ago, I posted on my own blog asking whether FiF and the Act of Synod had in fact done us any favours, or merely lulled us into a semi-anesthetized state in which we were kidding ourselves that we were living a Catholic life that was in fact totally illusory. I had lost patience and was close — though I did not realize it — to making my own decision to convert, the moment for which came in the Sanctuary at the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima at a candlelit midnight Mass attended by some 500,000 people.

The closer I had got to that point, the crosser I got with the CofE and the staus quo I had participated in. Once the decision was made and began to be acted upon, the less cross I became. And I became increasingly conscious of just how patient my Catholic friends had been with me as I wrestled my Anglican demons. And how important their patience had been in giving me the space to get to the point many of them had reached months or years before.

The point of all of which being in the context of reactions to Friday's Sacred Synod and MSOSWASH is that while they may well seemed to many to have been self-deluding and putting off the real decision and the real action, Bishop Andrew Burnham's metaphor of the caravan, which has not always been well-received by some Anglo-Catholics, comes into its own.

Some — such as those who became Catholics in the early 1990s and before — right back to and beyond Newman — were at the head of the caravan. Some have sadddled up, headed out and arrived in the meantime. Some of us, by means of Anglicanorum coetibus or individual submission are currently loading up and getting on our way.

Many are still sitting in the oasis, not yet able to make their move even though they know that the water in the oasis is likely to dry up in the not-too-distant future. Some haven't looked in the well yet to realize that it is drying up. These — much as we who have made our decisions might want them with us — will not be encouraged or assisted in their journey by our impatience with them. Indeed, they might be obstructed — put off by the idea of crossing the Tiber when those who have crossed it already seem keen only to turn round and kick sand impatiently back in their faces from the other bank.

I have got to where I have got to — the point of conversion — not because I was beaten over the head with what I can now see as self-evident logic by others who might have seen my participation in the last 15 years of Anglo-Catholicism in the CofE as complacent, but because they were patient and had faith that in God's good time I would come to a proper discernment of where I should be.

Those of us shortly to become members of the Catholic Church need, I think, to learn some of that quietude and patience. It is after all the case — and I can't remember where I get this from — that it is far easier to catch flies with honey than with vinegar.

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!