About
I am the Senior Warden of the Cathedral of the Incarnation (Orlando, FL) and a member of the Standing Committee of the Anglican Church in America’s Diocese of the Eastern United States. The ACA is the American province of the Traditional Anglican Communion (TAC).
I enter the world of blogging only reluctantly. Though I have followed the Anglo-Catholic and traditionalist Roman Catholic blogosphere closely for a number of years, my participation has always been limited to that of a spectator. A lay leader in my Anglican parish and diocese, it has been helpful to keep abreast both of developments in sister jurisdictions of the so-called “Continuing Church” and ecumenical developments with other Catholic groups — but I have always been wary of entering the fray. The pitched battles waged in the comment boxes of weblogs rarely prove productive. The unhappy divisions in the Anglican Continuum have made for a digital minefield that has hardly seemed worth treading, and, as an Anglican, I have generally felt it presumptuous to publicly comment on Roman Catholic sites. Moreover, my leadership role in the Church requires a certain discretion and, until now, there has never been a reason for me to complicate matters by mounting an online soapbox.
In October of 2007, the House of Bishops of the Traditional Anglican Communion petitioned the Holy See for a provision which would allow the TAC — corporately — to enter full communion with the Roman Catholic Church. Similar appeals were made by other Anglican groups, most notably Forward in Faith UK.
On November 9, 2009, the Holy Father answered the prayers of generations of Anglican Catholics with the publication of the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus which provides for canonical structures allowing Anglican groups to enter full communion with the Catholic Church while preserving elements of the distinctive Anglican spiritual and liturgical patrimony.
While the response to the Holy Father’s most generous provision has been overwhelmingly positive in Anglo-Catholic circles in the UK, in the United States, where a distinctively anti-papalist brand of churchmanship developed (though one evidently unconcerned with aping virtually every aspect of Roman ritual and ceremonial), the response of many Anglican groups and personalities has been skeptical and even hostile. Nowhere has there been more negativity — indeed lies and plain bigotry — than among the leaders and online personalities of the ACA’s sister jurisdictions in the Anglican Continuum. These self-appointed experts in canon law, sacramental theology, and history purport to speak for a genuine, “classical” Anglicanism. I have started this blog because the divisive, hateful rhetoric of many “Continuing Anglicans” does not speak for me — nor does it represent the views of a great many churchmen in the ACA. This is a moment for which we have prayed and sacrificed.
The provision made by our Holy Father in the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus is the greatest development in the life of the Anglican Church since the Reformation. After witnessing the implosion of the official structures of the Anglican Communion and struggling to maintain the Faith in the fractured and dwindling realm of the Anglican Continuum, once despondent Anglo-Catholics now look with hope to a future in which the Anglican Patrimony will live on, with renewed vigor, in communion with the Successor of St. Peter.
As the Bishop of Ebbsfleet put it at the recent FiF UK National Assembly:
“We are Western Christians, Catholics of the Latin Rite separated from the Holy See. We are invited together in a kenotic, self-emptying way, without denying who we are, and what we have been, to re-enter the fullness of unity severed by act of state five hundred years ago.”
Through this blog, I hope to give a voice to many American Anglo-Catholics — within and without the ACA — who are working and praying for the unity of Christ’s Church. The opinions expressed will be my own. I do not purport to speak for the Cathedral Chapter or the Diocesan Standing Committee — but I certainly hope to offer the unique perspectives of a Continuing Anglican parish and diocese as each, by the grace of God, finds safety in the Barque of Peter. Along the way, I will offer my insights on matters of Anglican Patrimony and the life of the Catholic Church.
I place this blog under the patronage of St. Mary the Virgin, the holy Mother of God, along with SS. Thomas Becket, Thomas More, and John Fisher.


about 3 months ago
Praised be Jesus Christ!
My name is Fr. Austin, and I am a convert to Catholicism (2001) from Anglo-Catholicism. I attended Church of the Good Shepherd, Rosemont, where Bishop Moyer is Rector.
At any rate, I am now a Catholic priest of the Fraternity of St. Peter (www.fssp.org), assigned to Sarasota, FL (although I occasionally make my way up to Ocala of a Sunday). If I can be of any help in re: Anglicanorum Coetibus, please do not hesitate to contact me.
God and Mary with you,
Fr. Austin
about 3 months ago
Fr. Austin,
It is good to make your acquaintance! I would very much like to discuss your perspective on Anglicanorum Coetibus.
Are you the regular celebrant of the TLM at Queen of Peace in Ocala? If so, I have probably heard one of your Masses.
I’ll be in touch via email later this week.
about 3 months ago
Best of luck in your efforts!
about 3 months ago
Great website Christian. Very impressed! I am a member of the Confraternity of St Peter, which is linked to the FSSP. Heard about this site from the New Liturgical movement.
about 3 months ago
Pax Tecum. Felicitaciones por su web y esfuerzo. Cuentan con nuestras oraciones. Dios les bendiga. Sursum Corda. Una Voce Córdoba (Argentina)
about 3 months ago
Dear Mr. Campbell:
VERY impressed with your blog. As a lifelong (Roman) Catholic, who credits the retention of his Faith partly to encountering St. Mary of the Angels, Hollywood, in my teens, I have longed for the reunion of orthodox Anglo-Catholics with the Holy See for the past 33 years. I knew Canon Dubois and Frs. Barker, Brown, and Tea, and followed closely the negotiations with Cardinal Seper at that time. You cannot imagine how saddened I was when St. Mary’s itself was rejected for insertion into the Pastoral Provision. The Apostolic Constitution approximates what was originally hoped for, and I am grateful to God that it has happened at last.
about 2 months ago
Hi,
I was a member at St. Marys during that time. I am now Catholic and my children were received by Fr. Tea as Anglican Use. Are you still in the area? Are you interested in the Anglican Use still and do you know any Anglicans here who would be interested in forming a group to start up a mission? I don’t know if St. Marys is now going to accept the offer. Please let me know if you choose to contact me and I’ll give you my e-mail address. I go to a very traditional Latin Rite parish, but miss St. Marys. Fr. Barker has a 6000 member parish not far from where I live.
Gay Yuhas
about 3 months ago
This is a wonderful tool to serve us. Thanks for the commentary and news on the Anglicanorum Coetibus. Our parishes need more information on this issue.
about 3 months ago
Christian,
I have really enjoyed reading your blog entries of late, having been informed of its existence by a Rorate Caeli blog post.
May God bless you!
Warm Regards in Christ,
Mark
about 3 months ago
DEAR BROTHERS AND FRIENDS:
On Saturday, December 12th, I will be attending a meeting at Our Lady of the Atonement Church in San Antonio and will carry greetings to them from our House of Bishops (ACA) and from our Primate (TAC). This was the very first Anglican Use Parish. It started with a mere handful of ex-Episcopalians and now has several thousand parishoners and a pre-K through 12 school. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss Anglicanorum coetibus which has been enthusiastically received by those in the Anglican Use. The church’s pastor is Father Christopher Phillips who posted the following remarks on their website which is at http://www.atonementparish.blogspot.com.
FATHER PHILLIPS COMMENTS FOLLOW:
When the text of Anglicanorum coetibus was made public, I had no hesitation at all in wanting to be part of an Ordinariate. I happened to be in Rome at the time of the announcement, and I excitedly called my archbishop and said to him that I wanted to send in a request right away. His response was, “What’s your hurry?”
His question didn’t make any sense to me. In fact, I pondered it all the way back from Rome. But I think I’ve figured it out.
He knows me as a pastor, and us as a parish, because we’re part of his archdiocese, just like his other priests and parishes. Sure, we have a different liturgical use. But heck, when you go around the archdiocese you’d swear that every single parish has its own liturgical use. He knows that we’re loyal to him as our archbishop. He knows our school as one of the finest in the archdiocese, recognized nationally as an excellent educational institution. We pay our money on time. We’re supportive of archdiocesan programs, such as pro-life efforts, the apostolate to the homeless and needy, the seminary, and a host of other things. When he visits the parish we welcome him as our spiritual Father-in-God. And then he gets a call from me, all excited about the new Apostolic Constitution, and the possibility of becoming part of an Ordinariate. I didn’t stop to think that he hadn’t been particularly waiting for this development. In fact, it hasn’t been on his radar screen at all. So when he hears me, naturally his first reaction is, “What’s your hurry?”
The thing is, the immediate desire to be part of an Ordinariate isn’t hurrying at all. We’ve been working for this and praying for this for some thirty years. When approaches were made to the Holy See back in the 1970’s, we had no idea what the Church might do for us. When the Pastoral Provision was established by Pope John Paul II, it was a huge step forward, and we entered into the process as quickly as we could. Why would we have waited around? We asked; Rome responded; we fulfilled the requirements as soon as possible, and we were welcomed home. But even then we knew that some sort of separate jurisdiction would be necessary if our parishes were going to grow and increase in numbers. And we took great comfort in the fact that the document outlining the terms of the Pastoral Provision allowed for this possibility.
In section II, 1 of the Pastoral Provision document signed by Cardinal Seper on July 22, 1980, Prot. N. 66/77, it states, “The preference expressed by the majority of the Episcopal Conference for the insertion of these reconciled Episcopalians into the diocesan structures under the jurisdiction of the local Ordinaries is recognized. Nevertheless, the possibility of some other type of structure as provided for by canonical dispositions, and as suited to the needs of the group, is not excluded.” (emphasis added).
That’s precisely what has happened with the promulgation of Anglicanorum coetibus. A new structure is being provided. We tried it the way the Episcopal Conference wanted it to be. Where we were allowed to exist, we were made part of the existing diocesan structures under the jurisdiction of the local Ordinary. And that’s the problem, clearly stated: “where we were allowed to exist.” There were a few bishops who allowed the erection of parishes, but many bishops refused to allow a parish to be established under the terms of the Pastoral Provision. Some bishops were confused by it all, and would refer it to someone in the Chancery system, where the request would languish. Many bishops saw this only in terms of “married priests.” Still other bishops couldn’t see the purpose of us having our own liturgy, and a number of them told potential converts, “Sign up for RCIA, and just become Catholics in your local parish.”
But now, with Anglicanorum coetibus, all that’s changed. Pope Benedict XVI recognized the constraints we’ve had for these many years, and he’s provided a solution. And not only provided it, but written it into the law of the Church, and extended it throughout the world.
There’s nothing here for me to agonize over. The Holy Father has made his decision under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and he’s signed the document, making the decision official and final.
So, with the deepest respect to those who feel they need more time to consider their options, or to explore issues, or to think about what they should do – by all means, take all the time you need.
And to those who think I’m hurrying, I’ve had all the time I need to think about it. I’ve been thinking about it for nearly thirty years. I’m happy to express my thanks by saying, “Yes.”
I FIND FATHER PHILLIPS’ REMARKS VERY INTERESTING. DON’T YOU?
Lewis Berry +
about 3 months ago
I would just like to say how glad I am to see your blog and how much I am enjoying your contribution in these interesting times.
God Bless,
Fr. J.
about 2 months ago
Just found your blog through Fr. Longenecker’s blog and am excited for you. Like many other like-minded Christians, I’ve prayed for Church Unity for many years. I’m extremely happy for all those who are coming in to be united with our beloved Roman Catholic Faith! I wait for the Lord to act and bring in our Eastern brothers & sisters too! This will give Christ great glory and answer His prayer to the Father “that they will be one, as We are One!”
I’m living just north of Orlando in Lake County and would enjoy meeting you some day, God willing. May your ministry be blessed by the Christ Child as we approach the celebration of His Birth+
Deacon John Giglio
about 2 months ago
Thanks for your excellent blog. It is good to see that there are others looking forward to being part of the ordinariate. I’m especially heartened to read of what’s happening in Springfield, MO– may that be repeated a hundred fold around the country! I’d like to see it happening in the LA area soon. God bless you.
Fr. Bill
about 2 months ago
Christian,
Thanks for all the work you’ve put into your blog. I made my way to your blog through Rorate Caeli.
I am a supporter of The Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter and Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest, though they have no Masses near my hometown in Southeast Texas.
I pray that the Apostolic Constitution bears much fruit. Best of luck in the blogosphere.
John M.
about 2 months ago
Christian,
please activate my username so i can respond on the forum.
thanx so much. God bless.
Mario
about 2 months ago
I tried again tonight to respond to one of the comments on the forum, but when I tried to log in, the message popped up that my user name was not activated and that i should contact an administrator to do so for me. Could anyone help me in this matter?
Thank you, again,
Mario
about 2 months ago
Mario,
I also had a problem with activating, I have two e-mail addresses and I think that was the reason, so I just used my other e-mail address and had no problems. You can contact Mr. Campbell, he might be able to solve the problem.
about 2 months ago
Guy,
thanx so much for your help and advice. Last night I signed something asking for my username to be activated. Thanx again.
Mario
about 1 month ago
Dearest brothers,
Two years ago, myslef and the 2 parishes that I pastored made the journey into the Western Rite of Holy Orthodoxy in the Antiochian Archdiocese here in the U.S. We celebrate the Eucharist with the Liturgy of St. Gregory the Great (the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass, but in English). We use the English Missal (Knott Missal) with a couple of Orthodox adjustments (filioque, etc…). The Orthodox Church has been receiving traditional Anglican/Episcopal clergy & parishes for decades within the Western-Rite. We just don’t have a “Press Conference” every time we do it. Maybe we should…
I would commend to those of you who are searching for and seeking unity with the Ancient Church, and its theological and ecclesiological stability, to consider the Western Rite of the Antiochian Orthodox Church. You will find no small print (as with Rome) that the Anglican provision only will allow married clergy for the current generation.
I would be more than will to chat with anyone wishing to explore this. You will find the Orthodox Church humble and accepting with open arms for those wishing to complete the Journey Home.
about 1 month ago
As one of the contributors on The Anglo-Catholic, I have decided to let this comment through. However, I (we) take a dim view of proselytism here. I allowed the comment, because people may be invited to consider the possibile alternative of a western rite arrangement under Eastern Orthodox jurisdiction.
It is my duty to add that Orthodoxy also is fraught with many problems, and western Christians looking for a western-rite solution often come very unstuck. It depends on the bishops concerned. Sometimes, Orthodox priests can go to the extent of telling Anglicans and others that they can never really and truly become Orthodox because they are of the wrong ethnic origins. I know such a position is extreme, but I am told it is not rare.
Another thing that must be said is that the Antiochian Church’s western rite solution is available only in the USA and Australia. Another possibility is the Russian Church outside Russia, now in communion with Moscow. There is an Ely Forum – http://elyforum.yuku.com/ for those who are interested. When it comes to doing anything practical and inhabitual, Orthodoxy’s snail-pace can be slower than Rome’s.
Check it all out for yourselves, but you will will find it no easier with them than with Rome. It might work for some but not for all. No hard feelings, but for heaven’s sake keep your eyes open and be realistic.
Caveat emptor…
about 1 month ago
Fr. Anthony,
My sincerest apology… I meant no harm! I thought this blog was focused on Anglicans moving toward unity with the larger body of the Historic Church.
In that Anglican’s profess belief in the one, holy catholic and apostolic Church, is it proselytism when either Rome or Orthodoxy invites and welcomes separated brethren to unity?
I am very thankful, for the open door that the Orthodox Church provided for me and the 2 parishes that I had responsibility for pastorally. The welcome has been and continues to be warm. In short, like in real estate, it is about 3 things; ecclesiology, ecclesiology, ecclesiology…of course, how theology is done flows from this as well as do all other things relating to the Church.
Please be assured of my prayers.
Under His mercy and in His love,
Fr. Ken+
about 1 month ago
Dear Father,
Many thanks for your clarification, and may God bless you and your community. We indeed should be moving together in love and Christian charity.
Fr. Anthony
about 1 month ago
As Father Chadwick said there are problems in Orthodoxy as well. My problem with it is that I can’t seem to get clarification on many questions about what Orthodoxy stands for.
I know that there are Catholic priests, Bishops, and laypeople who don’t always accept the teachings of the Church, but that doesn’t change the doctrine that has been in place for two thousand years.
I find that the Orthodox seem to have different views on doctrine and this is acceptable within their Church. Also although they deny many Catholic doctrines, it appears to be in the wording not the actual doctrine itself. They don’t define doctrines, which the Catholic Church had to do when heresy appeared.
When our parish split and the Pastoral Provision was started, some went to the Western Rite of the Orthodox church. I attended once and it didn’t feel very Anglican to me. Also I feel that some Orthodox have a disdain for people who come into there church. Some insist that Catholics must be re-baptized and confirmed again. Where the Catholic Church accept an Orthodox’s sacraments as valid.
I would never go to a forum that is for specific reasons, i.e. Anglicans coming into the Catholic Church and try to usurp the point of the forum to gain members into their own denomination. People are here to find out what procedures they need to become part of the Ordinariate or some are here just to support Anglicans in their quest to belong to the the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
Fr. Chadwick is very charitable and I appreciate that. This is a difficult time for Anglicans who are moving on into the unknown.
For whatever is lacking in some Catholics or parishes I love the Catholic Church and the communion I feel with other Catholics, not something I experienced in the Episcopal church.
Let us all pray for an Anglican Use parish in as many places as possible as I believe that our Anglican traditions will enrich the Church greatly.
about 1 month ago
I’m Roman Catholic and Mexican. I lived in England for a while and had the blessing of attending Catholic mass at Sussex University’s Meeting House and, from time to time, some Anglican services as well. I also went on a pilgrimage to Walsingham with a mixed Anglican and Catholic students’ group. (Students Cross Pilgrimage). For those people who just don’t “get” what ecumenism is all about, I suggest going to Walsingham if they can, or at least, learn about it… and meet and get to know somebody from a different christian tradition. Greetings from Mexico City
Graziella María Raluy Zierold de Turnbull
about 1 month ago
Dear Father Anthony et. al.,
May the Lord bless you all on your journey toward unity with the Ancient Church. Be assured of my continued prayers. I am always here and available for anyone interested in the Western-Rite of Holy Orthodoxy as a viable option for many.
Pax Christi,
Fr. Ken DeVoie+
Emmanuel Orthodox Catholic Church
Warren, MA
http://www.emmanuelorthodox.org
about 1 month ago
I do believe that a clarification about the western rite in Byzantine Orthodoxy is required. Presently the largest numbers of such groups exist in the Philippines, but only recently Fr. John D’Alton, a priest of the Australian diocese, has admitted publicly that the western rite is only to be used until such time as “the normal liturgy of St. John Chrysostom can be learned.” All such parishes in England were forced, soon after conversion, to adopt the Byzantine rite; even in the United States it exists only as a despised sideline and parishes are coxed into adopting the Byzantine rite there as well. I recently wrote to a priest in a former western rite parish in South Caroline, who was sent to the parish specifically to Byzantinise it, Fr. David Randoph, asking if this did not contradict certain promises made by the Antiochian leadership? His only reply was to call me a Jackass.
Fr. Ken has also failed to mention that even the Antiochians are now re-baptising converts; hence, to join their religion one must first admit that one has never been a Christian in the first place! Please see the web site of St. John the New Theologian Church in San Juan, Ca. One must add that the priest who did a mass re-baptism of Charismatic Episcopal church members, including their former priest, did not even know the proper manner of conducting an Orthodox baptism, and was himself, a Catholic hating converted Protestant, never rebaptised!
Although there may be many hurdles to jump with Rome, at least they accept Anglicans as Christians, something that I consider to be a major starting off point!