Mr. Goebbels, Sex Abuse, the Nazis and the Catholic Church

This article by John L Allen Jr appeared on Apr. 17, 2010 in NCR Today.  It is of more than passing interest.

* * *

Perhaps the most remarkable defense of Benedict XVI and the Catholic Church vis-à-vis the sexual abuse crisis to appear in recent weeks ironically never mentions the current pope, and it comes not from a senior Vatican official but a lay Italian sociologist of religion. In a nutshell, the suggestion – never made explicit, but clear nonetheless – is that today’s drumbeat of criticism of the church over “pedophile priests” amounts to a replay of a Nazi smear campaign.

Massimo Introvigne, who directs the international Center for Studies on New Religions, published an essay in the April 16 edition of L’Avvenire, the official newspaper of the Italian bishops, about a Nazi campaign in 1937 led by Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels to discredit the Catholic Church following Pope Pius XI’s anti-Nazi encyclical Mit brennender Sorge. Introvigne argues that Goebbels created what sociologists would later call a “moral panic,” based on real facts, but facts which are distorted and amplified.

In the end, Introvigne says, the plan backfired – Goebbels’ attempt to smear the church generated more outrage than actual cases of sexual abuse in 1930s-era German Catholicism, which were reported in the German media and tried in German courts.

The following is an NCR translation of Introvigne’s essay, the Italian original of which may be found here: http://www.avvenire.it

Goebbels and the pedophile priests operation

In 1937 the Nazi propaganda minister organized a campaign to discredit the Catholic Church in response to the encyclical ‘Mit brennender Sorge.’ The head of the German military’s counter-espionage unit, Wilhelm Canaris, passed the documents to Pius XII.

By MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

“There are cases of sexual abuse that come to light every day against a large number of members of the Catholic clergy. Unfortunately it’s not a matter of individual cases, but a collective moral crisis that perhaps the cultural history of humanity has never before known with such a frightening and disconcerting dimension. Numerous priests and religious have confessed. There’s no doubt that the thousands of cases which have come to the attention of the justice system represent only a small fraction of the true total, given that many molesters have been covered and hidden by the hierarchy.”

An editorial from a great secular newspaper in 2010? No: It’s a speech of May 28, 1937, by Joseph Goebbels (1897-1945), Minister of Propaganda for the Third Reich. This speech, which had a large international echo, was the apex of a campaign launched by the Nazi regime to discredit the Catholic Church by involving it in a scandal of pedophile priests.

Two hundred and seventy-six religious and forty-nine diocesan priests were arrested in 1937. The arrests took place in all the German dioceses, in order to keep the scandals on the front pages of the newspapers.

On March 10, 1937, with the encyclical Mit brennender Sorge, Pope Pius XI (1857-1939) condemned the Nazi ideology. At the end of the same month, the Nazi Ministry of Propaganda headed by Goebbels launched a campaign against the sexual abuses of priests. The design and administration of this campaign are known to historians thanks to documents which tell a story worthy of the best spy novels.

In 1937, the head of the counter-espionage service of the German military was Admiral Wilhelm Canaris (1887-1945). He became gradually anti-Nazi, and at the time was maturing the convictions which led him to organize the failed assassination attempt against Hitler in 1944, following which he was hanged in 1945. Canaris disapproved of Goebbels’ maneuver against the Church, and instructed a Catholic lawyer named Josef Müller (1878-1979) to carry to Rome a series of highly secret documents on the subject.

In different phases, Müller – before he was arrested and sent to the Dachau extermination camp, where he survived, and later became the post-war Minister of Justice in Bavaria – carried the secret documents to Pius XII (1876-1958), who asked the Society of Jesus to study them.

With the approval of the Secretary of State, the study of the Nazi plot against the Church was entrusted to the German Jesuit Walter Mariaux (1894-1963), who had inspired an anti-Nazi organization in Germany called “Pauluskreis.” He was later prudently sent as a missionary in Brazil and in Argentina. There, as leader of the Marian Congregation, he exercised his influence over an entire generation of lay Catholics, among whom was the noted Brazilian Catholic thinker Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira (1908-1995), who attended his group in São Paulo. In 1940, in London in English and in Argentina in Spanish, Mariaux published two volumes on anti-Catholic persecution by the Third Reich under the pseudonym “Testis Fidelis.” They contained over seven hundred pages of documents with comments, which aroused great emotion in the entire world.

The expression “moral panic” was only coined by sociologists in the 1970s to identify a social alarm created as a kind of art, accomplished by amplifying real facts and exaggerating their numbers through statistical folklore, as well as “discovering” and presenting as “new” events which in reality are already known and which date to the past. There are real events at the base of the panic, but their number is systematically distorted.

Even without the benefit of modern sociology, Goebbels responded to the encyclical Mit brennender Sorge in 1937 with a textbook case of the creation of a moral panic.

As always in moral panics, the facts are not totally invented. Prior to the encyclical there were some cases in Germany of abuse of minors. Mariaux himself considered a religious in the school of Bad Reichenall guilty, as well as a lay teacher, a gardener and a janitor, who were condemned in 1936, although he believed that the sanction imposed by the Ministry of Public Instruction in Bavaria – revoking the authorization to run scholastic institutes of four religious orders – to be entirely disproportionate, and he linked it to the desire of the regime to undercut Catholic schools. Also in the case of the Franciscans of Waldbreitbach, in Rhineland, Mariaux was open to the hypothesis that the accused were guilty, although later historians have not excluded the possibility that they were framed by the Nazis.

The cases, which were few, but real, produced a very strong reaction from the episcopate. On June 2, 1936, the Bishop of Münster – Blessed Clemens August von Galen (1878-1946), who was the soul of Catholic resistance to Nazism, and who was beatified in 2005 by Benedict XVI – had a declaration read at all the Sunday Masses in which he expressed “pain and sadness” for these “abominable crimes” that “cover our Holy Church with ignominy.” On August 20, 1936, after the events at Waldbreitbach, the German episcopate published a joint pastoral letter in which they “several condemned” those responsible and underlined the cooperation of the Church with the tribunals of the state.

By the end of 1936, the severe measures taken by the German bishops in reaction to these very few cases, some of which were doubtful, seemed to have resolved the real problems. Submissively, the bishops also pointed out that among teachers in the state schools and in the very youth organization of the regime, the Hitler Youth, the cases of condemnations for sexual abuses were much more numerous than among the Catholic clergy.

It was the anti-Nazi encyclical of Pius XI that led to the great campaign of 1937. Mariaux proved it publishing highly detailed instructions sent by Goebbels to the Gestapo, the political police of the Third Reich, and above all to journalists, just a few days after the publication of Mit brennender Sorge, inviting them to “reopen” the cases from 1936 and also older cases, constantly recalling them to public opinion. Goebbels also ordered the Gestapo to find witnesses willing to accuse a certain number of priests, threatening them with immediate arrest if they didn’t collaborate, even if they were children.

The proverbial phrase “there’s a judge in Berlin,” which in German tradition indicates trust in the independence of the court system from the political power of the moment, applied – within certain limits – even in the Third Reich. Of the 325 priests and religious arrested after the encyclical, only 21 were condemned, and it’s all but certain that among them some were falsely accused. Virtually all of them ended up in extermination camps, where many died.

The effort to discredit the Catholic Church on an international scale through accusations of immorality and pedophilia among priests, however, did not succeed.

Thanks to the courage of Canaris and his friends, and to the persistence of the Jesuit detective Mariaux, the truth was already out during the war. The perfidy of the campaign of Goebbels aroused more indignation than the eventual guilt of some religious. The father of all moral panics in the area of pedophile priests blew up in the hands of the Nazi propagandists who had tried to organize it.
[John Allen is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@ncronline.org.]

* * *

Be sure to follow our Moderator at Eccentric Bliss, his personal blog!
This entry was posted in General and tagged by Fr. John Fleming. Bookmark the permalink.

About Fr. John Fleming

Fr. John Fleming, himself the son of an Anglican priest, was ordained for the Diocese of Adelaide in the Anglican Church in Australia in 1970. He served as President of the Union of Anglican Catholic Priests, an organization devoted to maintaining the Catholic tradition in the Anglican Church. In the early 1970s, Fr. Fleming served as University Chaplain and Rector of St. Paul’s Church, Adelaide ministering to university students and other young people. From 1977-1978, he was Assistant Curate at St. Nicholas Church, Chiswick in West London before returning to Adelaide where he became Rector of the Church of the Good Shepherd, Plympton. He remained there until Easter 1987, when he and his wife Alison were received into the Catholic Church. Fr. Fleming was a member of the General Synod and the Social Responsibilities Commission of the Anglican Church of Australia. The story of his conversion, dealing with the intellectual and spiritual issues involved, will be found in a new book to be published in April, 2010. Fr. Fleming specializes in the development of public policy in bioethics. His Ph.D. (Griffith University, Queensland) is in philosophy and medical ethics. He was a founding member (1992-1996) of UNESCO’s International Bioethics Committee which developed the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO on November 11, 1997). Between 1998-2004, he was a member of the SA Council on Reproductive Technology (SA Parliament). Fr. Fleming is a Corresponding Member of the Pontifical Academy for Life (from 1996), Faculty Member of John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family (from 2001), and (from 2002) Member of the Gene Technology Ethics Committee (GTEC) set up under the Gene Technology Act 2000 (Commonwealth of Australia). He was the founding President of Campion College Australia (2004-2009), the country’s first Catholic liberal arts tertiary institution. He also served as the founding Director of Adelaide’s Southern Cross Bioethics Institute (1987-2004), where he currently teaches as Adjunct Professor of Bioethics. In addition to bioethics, Fr. Fleming has a longstanding interest in the Reformation history and liturgy.

2 thoughts on “Mr. Goebbels, Sex Abuse, the Nazis and the Catholic Church

  1. Massimo Introvigne is a specialist in the subject of religious movements, some of which may according to certain criteria be qualified as cults. His website is http://www.cesnur.org/

    I have a tremendous amount of esteem for Introvigne, as he has had to combat those people in Europe who wish to curtail religious freedom in the name of ideology and on the pretext of the danger cults present to the weak and vulnerable. Are people assumed to be like children and should they be “mothered” by a “Nanny State”? If that is so, then all the affirmations of freedom in most modern national constitutions is but vain claptrap. There's no freedom. We are all doing as we are influenced. Except that some people have learned to be free, and that comes through Christian asceticism…

    On this site, you will find articles about “brainwashing controversies”. To what extent can a cult guru remove the radical freedom of his adepts? Some sects have proven really dangerous and murderous like the Solar Temple and the Jim Jones setup, where people were induced to commit suicide. Such dangerous cults would be in the minority, and the solution is obviously to punish the guru for specific facts of breaches of the law, leaving peaceful religious movements free to pursue their way.

    The Church can easily compete against the cults. Simply bring back God, the beauty of holiness, an other-worldly liturgy and coherent moral teaching. Many people have joined cults because they were “unchurched”, whether through their own negligence or because they suffered from a bad priest.

    Today’s politically correct establishment want to do away with all religion that does not collaborate with their agenda. I have noticed over the years how the French secular authorities have applied pressure not only on the Church, but also on minority religious movements. Probably the most difficult thing to prove is the adverse effect on human freedom of “brainwashing”. The State itself influences people and the media tell us how to think and act – as morons.

    It is understandable for the law to seek to protect the vulnerable: children, elderly people, the sick and mentally handicapped, people suffering from emotional trauma, etc. The problem is that, for atheists, all religion is a way to “alienate” people and something that causes serious damage. They would not say as much of political ideology, especially when it is their own! People’s minds continue to be rotted by the media and TV, and all that is just OK!

    The condemnation of things that are held to influence people is highly selective, as it was in the days of Hitler and Göbbels. Religion is dangerous, they said, but evil doctors performing atrocious experiments on humans in the concentration camps were without doubt doing a lot of good to society and their “patients”! It's a point of view…

    A Pope who forbids artificial contraception is pilloried as a murderer, but the real killing goes on in abortion clinics. Accusing the Pope of killing is assuming that the people in Africa who die because they have too many babies (or catch AIDS) are not free, and are not able to make an informed decision. They are “brainwashed” if the Church is doing the brainwashing, but they are not brainwashed if atheists are doing much worse! Upholding human life is highly selective. Introvigne is right to compare the present media with Nazi propaganda and ideology.

    We live in frightening times!

  2. Thank you Fr Chadwick. I had hoped to stimulate intelligent comment, and it seems I have succeeded. If we transpose the word "secularism" for "Nazism", and given Pope Benedict's sustained critique of secularism, perhaps it is is not surprising that the "secularist" press is gunning for him!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>